What consequences would a post-Brexit China-UK trade deal have for the EU?
A China-UK free trade agreement has been
extensively discussed since the UK’s vote for Brexit. Many supporters
of Brexit argue that the UK’s regained flexibility to strike trade deals
with other partners, and in particular with China given its economic
size, will be a key advantage. This analysis indicates that a China-UK
FTA will be neither as easy nor as clearly advantageous as portrayed by
Brexit supporters.
Brexit means that the United Kingdom
could be able to run its own trade policy, which opens the door for the
potential negotiation of a free trade agreement between the UK and
China. Alicia Garcia-Herrero and Hianwei Xu show that a UK-China FTA
will be neither easy nor clearly advantageous for the UK:
It will be difficult for the UK to reach
an agreement with China without first establishing a new post-Brexit
partnership with the EU. Negotiating tariffs with other WTO members will
be a pre-condition if the UK exits the EU customs union, and this
process will require time and effort.
Even if the UK reaches an agreement with
China, the UK cannot serve as a back door for Chinese products to enter
the EU, because the EU is very likely use rules of origin to close any
such loopholes.
The UK and the other EU economies differ
in most of their exports to China, so there would be very limited
substitution between them.
It therefore seems that establishing a
new trade relationship with the EU would be a more urgent task for the
UK in the post-Brexit world, rather than an FTA with China. Under such
circumstances, the UK might need to postpone its trade negotiations with
other economies outside of EU, including China.
This goes beyond the current discussion
of the illegality of the UK starting to negotiate trade deals before it
leaves the EU. The issue is whether it makes economic sense for the UK
to do so, and the answer is no. In fact, the more the UK reaches an
independent favourable trade agreement with China after Brexit, the
harder it will be for the UK to strike a good deal with EU.
In the meantime, it is also urgent for
the UK to negotiate with the main WTO members on tariffs, because
outside the EU, the UK might not participate in the EU schedule of
concessions. The best strategy for the UK would be to negotiate with the
other WTO members with the EU-based tariffs as a starting point, to
avoid negotiating over terms separately and also to maintain a close
relationship with the EU.
Por: Alicia Garcia-Herrero e Jianwei Xu
Fonte: Bruegel, em 10 de Outubro de 2016
Ver também:
Hard Brexiteers are making a colossal miscalculation
Hard Brexiteers seem to believe that it
will be up to the EU to agree to tariff-free trade “because it is in
their interests”, but they are making a colossal miscalculation, writes
Michael Emerson. (...)
Por: Michael Emerson
Fonte: EurActiv, em 10 de Outubro de 2016
The Political Logic of Hard Brexit
(...) An almost revolutionary – and very
un-British – dynamic has taken hold, and, as British Prime Minister
Theresa May indicated in her “Little Englander” speech at the
Conservative Party conference this month, the UK is heading for a “hard
Brexit.”
That outcome would run counter to
British public opinion, which remains moderate on the question of fully
breaking with the EU. (...)
Por: Jacek Rostowski
Fonte: Project-Syndicate, em 10 Outubro de 2016
Clamor en el sector empresarial y financiero ante el 'Brexit duro' planteado por Londres
De la City de Londres a la Cámara
Española de Comercio, de la Confederación de la Industria Británica
(CBI) al Consorcio de Minoristas (BRC), del sector del automóvil al de
la alimentación... El clamor contra el 'Brexit duro' ha ganado una
fuerza inusitada en los últimos días tras el viraje del Gobierno de
Theresa May, que ha dejado abierta la espita a una ruptura total de las
relaciones comerciales con Bruselas para poder controlar la inmigración.
(...)
Carlos Fresneda
Fonte: El Mundo, em 13 Outubro de 2016
Comentários
Enviar um comentário